[WVDXA] Question of the day
W8DL at aol.com
W8DL at aol.com
Thu Feb 8 06:44:36 PST 2007
Greg
Two questions.
(1) first how many and how log should the radials be ? First no matter the
length the more the better. That was easy. Second Ideally the radials should be
about 10 percent longer than a quarter wave ( approx 70 feet for an 80
meter vertical. ) NOTE: if you don't have room for 70 ft radials it is better to
install lots of shorter ones. I have two 65 ft verticals I use on 80 and 40
meters. Each vertical has 64 radials that are 70 feet long.
I use matching networks at the base of each vertical and feed them as 1/4
wave verticals on 80 meters and 1/2 wave verticals on 40 meters
(2) Which vertical will work best on 160 ? since both the 65 ft and 53 ft
vertical are both much shorted than the size of a full quarter wave on 160
meters the answer as to which will be the most effective on 160 meters is
dependent upon HOW they are loaded ( Top , Mid, or Base ). All other things being
equal If done properly the top loaded vertical will be more effective. So if
the 53 foot vert is a top loaded design it would probably be more effective
than a 65 foot vert with base loading. There are many other things that affect
the losses in an antenna, such as the "Q" of the loading system. So just to
choose from the length alone is not a good plan,. You must know all the other
factors.
The above assumes ground mounted verticals with the radials either on the
ground surface or buried a few inches
I hope this helps
73's Don W8DL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wvdxa.org/pipermail/wvdxa_wvdxa.org/attachments/20070208/ea50121d/attachment.html
More information about the WVDXA
mailing list